Listen to this article here
The Black Wall Street Times

Sign-Up for a free subscription to The Black Wall Street Timesdaily newsletter, Black Editors’ Edition (BEE) – our curated news selections & opinions by us for you.

Oklahoma, which claims to be a pro-life state, would rather be a pro-forced birth state. HB 4327, which has passed in the Oklahoma House and Senate, is a near-total ban on abortion, and also a “bounty hunter” law, one that encourages neighbors to report on each other. 

Meanwhile, according to Emily Wales, President and CEO of Planned Parenthood Great Plains, more than half the states in this country will want to follow Oklahoma’s example. Abortion rights will return to state laws if and when Roe V Wade is struck down by the Supreme Court.

Following a leaked memo from the Supreme Court, Roe v Wade, which would celebrate 50 years of providing healthcare freedom next year, is in danger. The SCOTUS currently has a majority-conservative court, and while the decision is not official, it is likely that SCOTUS will end federal healthcare protections for women in the near future.

“Unconstitutional” abortion ban headed for Governor’s desk

Meanwhile, Oklahoma’s new potential law is unconstitutional, according to Rabia Muqadam, one of the attorneys for the Center for Reproductive Rights. However, the Oklahoma state supreme court has not yet provided an injunction against the law, although it is being fought in court.

HB 4327 will go into effect as soon as Governor Kevin Stitt signs it into law. Governor Stitt has vowed to sign any anti-abortion law that comes across his desk. 

Unfortunately, losing reproductive rights will have a vast impact on Black women and Black families. In fact, a Black infant in Oklahoma is twice as likely to die during their first year of life than a White infant. 

Oklahoma also ranked 34th in the country for maternal mortality. Once again, Black women are also at greater risk for dying during pregnancy or childbirth than White women.

Oklahoma is pro-life…until the baby is born

Black women also seek abortions more frequently than White women. Planned Parenthood confirmed that citizens seeking an abortion must now travel out of state to seek health care – a financial and practical barrier for all women, but one that impacts Black women more acutely.

Black women are more likely to live in lower socio-economic communities, and have less access to comprehensive healthcare than White women and their families. Black women are less likely to have received thorough reproductive education, putting them at risk for pregnancy-related comorbidities, including gestational diabetes and low birthweight babies.  

Women in Oklahoma who are seeking abortion must now travel to either Kansas, New Mexico, or Colorado to receive their healthcare. Those three nearby states still provide access to abortions – for now. 

However, Planned Parenthood Great Plains, the Center for Reproductive Rights, and the Oklahoma ACLU plan to fight on behalf of healthcare freedom in Oklahoma. During a press conference Ms. Wales, president of Planned Parenthood Great Plains, said, “While this is a dark day, we have a message. To all who need care, we see you.” 

Erika Stone is a graduate student in the Master of Social Work program at the University of Oklahoma, and a graduate assistant at Schusterman Library. A Chess Memorial Scholar, she has a B.A. in Psychology...

6 replies on “Oklahoma advances bill banning abortion at fertilization”

  1. Banning abortion upon conception opens a whole other arena of women’s oppression for the white men of the OK legislature to abuse. Actual proposed laws include forcing women to stage a funeral for miscarriages. Does invitro fertility treatments become murder for dropped test tubes or expelled fertilized eggs? We know the right delights in control so what is next? It is bad enough now that family members or friends can be sued for helping a woman. Also, with the Supreme Court saying that the later Constitutional Amendments like the 14th interpreted to protect privacy, do not apply if the wording is not included in the original Constitution, many more rights will be attacked. Is marriage mentioned in the Constitution? NO so back to States Rights for Gay and Inter-racial marriage. Alito’s decision, we are told, specifically states that this ruling invalidating the 14th Amendment is not to be interpreted to do away with any other rights the court has given under the privacy clause. Yet, every voting member for overturning Wade v. Roe also promised that Roe was established precedent to get appointed. We are to believe this pack of partisan frauds that they will honor other rights long banned by States before the 14th Amendment? Justice Thomas won’t even recuse himself when his wife has been found to be deep in the unconstitutional attempt to overthrow the Constitutional election of our President. Winding up on the losing end of an 8 to one vote even with this pack of frauds on Jan. 6 related decisions..

Comments are closed.