OKMULGEE, Okla.–The Muscogee (Creek) Nation Supreme Court released an order Monday scheduling oral arguments in a case that will decide whether to uphold or reverse a tribal district ruling that that reinstated citizenship eligibility to Creek Freedmen descendants.

The oral arguments hearing, scheduled for Friday, June 20, 2025 at 10:00 a.m. CST, paves the way for the Muscogee Nation Attorney General to challenge the decision to reinstatement Creek Freedmen descendants into the tribal nation of their ancestors.

Justice for Greenwood, led by national civil rights attorney Damario Solomon-Simmons, has been fighting in the courts for years on behalf of a community and history many people outside of Oklahoma don’t even know. Black Creeks, by blood, lineage or otherwise, were instrumental in the forming of Greenwood’s Black Wall Street.

Attorney Damario Solomon-Simmons speaks to reporters outside the Muscogee Creek Nation court building after a judge delayed ruling on a lawsuit that demands Black Creek descendants be reinstated into the tribe of their ancestors on December 1, 2022. (Mike Creef / The Black Wall Street Times)

“Our team is focused on preparing for the argument as we believe we are closer than ever to finally securing citizenship for the Creek Freedmen,” Jana Knot, an attorney on the plaintiffs’ legal team, told the Black Wall Street Times.

Advertisement

The Black Wall Street Times reached out to the office of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation Attorney General. A representative said the office would not discuss it because it’s an ongoing case.

“We can’t discuss that case because it’s ongoing, and it’s on appeal, so we can’t discuss it with you,” the representative said.

Muscogee Nation AG seeks to reverse ruling for Creek Freedmen

In a historic move on September 27, 2023, Muscogee Nation District Judge Denette Mouser ruled in favor of Rhonda Grayson and Jeff Kennedy, who sued the tribe’s citizenship board for denying their right to apply for citizenship.

Almost immediately, Muscogee Nation Attorney General Geri Wisner appealed the ruling in a legal battle to keep Freedmen out of the tribe. She was quietly sanctioned by Muscogee (Creek) Nation District Judge Mouser months before the ruling for attempting to intimidate the judge.

Advertisement

In one hearing, AG Wisner placed a document on the judge’s desk that described how to recall a judge.

“Thus, the Court’s only inference can be that the true motive of such action was at worst a veiled threat of removal from the bench, or at best an attempt to intimidate the Court prior to its ruling on Plaintiffs’ motion and/or prior to rendering final judgement,” Judge Mouser stated in her sanction order.

Creek Freedmen attorneys “extremely pleased” case will move forward

Monday’s order moving the case forward comes after the case had been stalled for months while the tribe’s high court decided a separate issue. In question was whether the tribe’s National Council had the authority to pass a new law appointing special justices.

“The Court finds that the appointment of a Special Justice…is unconstitutional and unenforceable,” it stated in an April 22 opinion.

Advertisement
creek freedmen court
Black Creek Freedmen and their supporters rallied outside the Muscogee (Creek) Nation District Court building in Okmulgee, Oklahoma, on Tuesday, April 4, during the first day of an historic trial. Black Creeks are suing the Muscogee (Creek) Nation to regain citizenship into the Tribe of their ancestors. (Mike Creef / The Black Wall Street Times)

Palmer Scott is a Muscogee (Creek) Nation citizen and an attorney. He’s attended several protests and court hearings in the case in support of Creek Freedmen citizenship.

“The National Council’s role is confined to confirming judicial nominations and creating inferior courts; it possesses no authority to impede the Court’s exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction,” Scott told theBWSTimes.

“In this instance, the rule of law has prevailed in the highest court of our Nation, and I remain confident that justice will be delivered to the Freedmen, consistent with promises embodied in our Treaty,” Scott said.

“The litigation team is extremely pleased with the Court’s ruling, finding NCA 24-77, the “Special Justice” law, unconstitutional and unenforceable,” Knot said.

Advertisement
creek freedmen courts
From left to right: Brittany Postoak, Palmer Scott and Frances Danger. These three Muscogee “by-blood” citizens support citizenship for Black Muscogee (Creek) Freedmen who were expelled from the tribal nation in 1979. (Twitter / The Black Wall Street Times)

“It’s my birthright”

Grayson and Kennedy, along with all Creeks who descend from ancestors listed on the segregated Freedmen Dawes Rolls, were expelled from the tribe in 1979 after the voting in of a new constitution. Freedmen descendants weren’t able to participate in that vote.

Judge Mouser’s Sept. 2023 court ruling affirmed that the 1866 Treaty between the U.S. Government and the Muscogee (Creek) Nation remains the supreme law of the land.

After the tribe’s role in supporting the Confederacy during the Civil War, the treaty affirmed the tribe’s reservation boundaries and made it promise to include Creek Freedmen and their descendants as full citizens with equal rights forever.

“It’s important to me because it’s my birthright,” Creek Freedmen plaintiff Rhonda Grayson told Muscogee Nation District Judge Denette Mouser.

Advertisement

Related Stories


Deon Osborne was born in Minneapolis, MN and raised in Lawton, OK before moving to Norman where he attended the University of Oklahoma. He graduated with a bachelor’s degree in Strategic Media and has...

2 replies on “Creek Freedmen case moves to oral arguments at tribal Supreme Court”

  1. If, and when , they win and are granted full rights, they must understand they will NOT viewed as “black “.
    Hence, they cannot use the race card if they may be denied economic funds of any sort.
    I advise they learn the ways of the Creeks who like many Indian tribes, are not as forward, boisterous, or verbally expressive as in black culture.

Comments are closed.